Subscribe to SouthsideCentral via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this website and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Archives

Follow me on Twitter

YouCentral: Gary Miller talks about pollution spills.

Here at SouthsideCentral, we invite all people and organizations to send us opinion pieces and statements. We will publish them unedited on a space-available basis. YouCentral articles are solely the opinion of the writer or organization. They do not necessarily represent the views of SouthsideCentral nor of our advertisers. We also encourage comments on these articles as well as opposing viewpoints (and we’ll be glad to publish them, too).

In this YouCentral article, Danville City Councilman & Vice Mayor Dr. Gary Miller compares & contrasts the recent oil spill from Robert Woodall Chevrolet and the Duke Energy coal ash spill.

From: Dr. Gary Miller

Recently, I had the opportunity to visit the site of two hazardous waste spills into our beautiful Dan River.

Last week, in the early morning hours of 9/21/2015, a valve failed on a motor oil storage tank in the back of Woodall’s on Riverside Drive spewing 400 gallons of waste motor oil onto the floor, into a drain and subsequently to a rain water run off pipe that emptied into the Dan River. Mr. Woodall and employees quickly recognize the seriousness of any toxic substance and the importance of immediate response. Once discovered the employees of Robert Woodall, who had been properly trained on how to respond and limit the spill, acted swiftly to curb the amount of oil that actually reached the Dan River by about 75%. Hazmat agencies were contacted and equipment put in place on the river which contained the contamination. Downstream cities were alerted.

Contrast the above incident at a locally owned family business with the incident in Feb. 2, 2014 of Duke Energy, a fortune 250 company, the largest power holding company in the United States with interest in several other countries, and over 120 billion dollars in assets. The size of the spill was much greater but the reaction time was also much slower. Hours passed after the original spill was detected, downstream cities were not made aware of the potential size of the spill until much later. There seemed to be no coordinated plan in place on the part of Duke Energy to rapidly contain a spill. That’s interesting because they had a similar spill a few years prior to this one at another location.

Also in 2014, downstream communities (including Danville) were not ready to rapidly limit contamination of water systems. When the water began to turn gray for the ash Danville water system employees began to take action. Danville now has a plan in place incorporating more effective communications with Duke Energy.

Eventually, at best, only 8-10% of the ash was removed from the river. Now, one and a half years later I revisited the site in Eden. Duke Energy is beginning to remove or attempt to contain about 3 million tons of accumulated fly ash produced over 63 years ago as a byproduct of the coal fed power plant and stored beside the Dan River.

1.3 million tons of the toxic ash will be shipped out by rail to an Amelia County Virginia waste storage site. The other 1.7 million tons will be stored on-site, although several hundred yards farther from the river. It will have two layers of plastic liners with sensors to detect any leakage. I did ask the life expectancy of the liners, but no one at the presentation could even specify a range. However, I was reassured that monitoring would be “very thorough”.

At least Duke Energy is beginning the removal of the ash from right beside the Dan River. I am cautiously optimistic that future spills will be prevented or at least be acted on more swiftly.

2 comments to YouCentral: Gary Miller talks about pollution spills.

  • Eazy E

    I’ve found this Woodall spill interesting since I first heard about it. Everyone says it happened in the early morning hours of the 21st. When I took my son to explore a fire truck the evening of the 20th. The firemen had to leave and their reason was that they were covering for another station that was responding to a hazmat spill. Could an investigative reporter please let us know what hazmat spill happened the evening before this one??

  • NicoleH

    Hazmat response doesn’t necessarily mean a big spill of some kind. It could have been a response to an accident where fluids (gas, oil, etc.) were spilled onto the highway or road shoulder.

Leave a Reply