Subscribe to SouthsideCentral via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this website and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Archives

Follow me on Twitter

NumbersCentral: Who showed up to vote in Danville?

Everybody loves numbers and math, so SouthsideCentral is debuting our NumbersCentral category. If a story can be told by charts, graphics, and numbers, we’ll show the information to you that way. Today’s edition is about the anemic voter turnout in Danville’s recent municipal elections…

19.02% of Danville’s registered voters cast ballots on Tuesday, but some precincts had a much higher turnout than others. Let’s do a BreakDown on where the interest was.

danvillevoterturnout1168 voters cast absentee ballots, so they’re not counted as voting at a precinct. I’m quite surprised at the much-higher turnout for Forest Hills compared to the rest of the precincts.

Looking at these numbers, you may think that Forest Hills was the “key to victory” in this election but that’s not the case. Here’s the precincts ranked by the number of voters that turned out.

1st 04 – Ballou Park 617
2nd 12 – American Legion 532
3rd 13 – Grove Park 493
4th 11 – Bonner 432
5th 16 – Park Avenue 425
6th 17 – Coates 412
7th 15 – Schoolfield 341
8th 10 – Woodberry 318
9th 05 – Forest Hills 288
10th 02 – Museum 212
11th 08 – GLH Johnson 211
12th 07 – Salvation Army 204
13th 09 – Glenwood 186
14th 03 – Langston 182
15th 18 – Absentee 168
16th 06 – Stonewall 157
17th 01 – Doyle Thomas Park 124
18th 14 – Gibson 77

Forest Hills delivered the highest percentage of voters but was only in ninth place based on the number of voters delivered.

We’ll continue to analyze these election numbers as well as any other numbers that we find interesting in our NumbersCentral category here on SouthsideCentral.

2 comments to NumbersCentral: Who showed up to vote in Danville?

  • Buddy

    Fascinating.

    Why does Danville have only at-large seats for City Council???????

    • Lee Smallwood

      At least one person believes strongly the use of at-large seats is about diluting the voting power of African Americans:

      http://www.protectcivilrights.org/pdf/voting/VirginiaVRA.pdf

      Of course, my understanding is that Danville is now majority African American (which does not mean the voter rolls reflect that change). If the Voting Rights Act’s pre-clearance provision still contained Virginia, it is conceivable that a plan to district the city would actually be objected to. Who knows? Election law is not close to my specialty, but you asked an interesting question so I looked into it. I’m not taking any position on the issue.

Leave a Reply