Subscribe to SouthsideCentral via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this website and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Archives

Follow me on Twitter

$25,000 Worth Of Discrimination

This is the first time that I’ve ever heard about a case like this getting to court in Danville, and it’s about time.

Here’s the full media release from Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia. Inc.

Danville Man’s Racially Discriminatory Housing Practices Cost Him $25,000 in Court.

Housing Opportunities Made Equal was awarded $25,000 this month in a case in the Circuit Court for the City of Danville against John Sylvania Matthews III.

Mr. Matthews, a landlord of multiple properties in the Danville area, has been held accountable for discriminating against African-American home seekers. When he advertised one of his units for lease in September, an African-American woman called and was told it was already rented. Within the hour, a white applicant called the same number about the same unit and was told it was indeed still available.

HOME then investigated and confirmed the allegations of housing discrimination. Mr. Matthews told HOME’s white tester that the property was move-in ready and located in “a good neighborhood” that was nice and quiet. He discouraged the African-American tester from renting the same property. He then steered her to other properties that were not yet available as he was still cleaning them out because “a bunch of damn n****** were living in ’em.”

The court held that Mr. Matthews violated two counts of the Federal Fair Housing Act. 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a) prohibits any person or entity from refusing “to negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin.” And, 42 U.S.C. § 3604(c) prohibits any person or entity from making any statement “with respect tothe sale or rental of a dwelling that indicates any preference, limitation, or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, or any intention to make any such preference, limitation, or discrimination.”

Judge James J. Reynolds found that HOME established that Mr. Matthews discriminated based on race by saying, “Obviously, one of the hallmarks of our society is we adopted a creed that all men are created equal, and what that means is that everybody, regardless of race, regardless of gender, is to be given the same opportunity. That’s not to be construed with guaranteeing results, but rather opportunity. The opportunity to rent or acquire housing is well established in both federal and state law, and it is something that has to be diligently protected, because there have been in the past certainly well-known instances where individuals’ right to obtain housing has been denied, based solely on an improper discriminatory purpose.”

HOME is represented by the law firm of Clement & Wheatley in Danville. Contact: W. Huntington Byrnes at (434) 793-8200 or byrnesh@clementwheatley.com. Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia, Inc. (HOME), founded in 1971, is a statewide fair housing non-profit. HOME’s mission is to ensure equal access to housing for all people. HOME investigates housing discrimination and provides support for discrimination victims. You can learn more about HOME and all of its services at www.HOMEofVA.org

 

Although I’m saddened by the discrimination proven here, I’m not surprised.

I had no idea that this group even existed before today so I started checking things out. They’re a non-profit organization that partners through local attorneys to file and lawsuits like this. The proceeds from the judgment go back into the non-profit and they use them for anti-discrimination classes and other agency programs. Although the victim in the case doesn’t get any money from the judgment, it’s not a money-making scam for the non-profit. You can find out about their programs at their website.

6 comments to $25,000 Worth Of Discrimination

  • Lee Smallwood

    The victim has her own separate case pending according to the judicial system website. This was a default judgment, by the way. They got a judgment. The question is whether they will ever be able to collect on it.

  • Jim

    I’ve resisted the urge to comment on this article since it was first posted, but now I feel like I must speak up.

    This is disturbing on so many levels! I realize that this man is probably older, and was probably born in a different era, and I realize that things were different in his generation, but that’s really no excuse. I can only imagine that the emotional scars that have been inflicted are unbearable. It is situations such as this that make me so very grateful that I grew up in a more enlightened era.

    I’ll just come out and ask the disturbing question that everyone else seems to be avoiding: who the hell names their kid Sylvania?

    • Comments like this make me see things in a different light. (groan)

    • Travis

      What if it was a SCAM! Yes I know discrimination happens, but what if the “lady” was really nasty on the phone, talked only in “slang”> something like this. Yo B I heards yous gots a crib 4 rents. How much I gets in it 4? I gets internets they 2. It got roam 4 my chilrens.

Leave a Reply